Foam is a frequent challenge in water treatment systems, especially in aeration tanks, biological treatment units, sludge handling, and industrial effluent processes. Excessive foam not only disrupts oxygen transfer and microbial activity but also leads to equipment overflow, pump cavitation, and reduced treatment efficiency. To maintain smooth operation and meet discharge standards, the use of effective defoamers is essential.

In biological wastewater treatment, foaming often results from surfactants, organic compounds, and filamentous bacteria. A suitable defoamer helps rapidly break surface bubbles, suppress second-generation foam, and keep aeration systems stable. In sludge dewatering and chemical dosing stages, defoamers improve separation efficiency and help prevent foam-induced delays or equipment contamination. For high-COD industrial wastewater—such as textile, pulp & paper, and chemical plants—defoamers support continuous, safe, and compliant operation.

Modern water treatment increasingly demands solutions that work in high-temperature, high-alkalinity, or biosensitive environments. As a result, low-toxicity, fast-spreading silicone and polyether formulations are widely favored. Selecting the right defoamer depends on foam cause, water quality conditions, and system dynamics. A well-designed foam control strategy not only improves treatment stability but also lowers chemical and maintenance costs over the long term.

Why Choose Rickman Defoamer for Water Treatment

Rickman defoamers are formulated to perform in complex water environments, offering fast foam-knockdown, long-term suppression, and good compatibility with biological processes. From biological aeration to industrial effluent and sludge handling, our product line provides options that minimize surface tension quickly without interfering with microbial activity or treatment chemistry.

In addition to high-performance products, Rickman is committed to delivering professional service and technical support. Our team provides tailored product recommendations, on-site guidance, and rapid response assistance to help customers optimize foam control strategies and improve system efficiency. With reliable supply capability and experience across diverse applications, Rickman supports stable and sustainable water treatment operations.

Click on the related products links：RK-500P（Polyether Defoamer For Paper Industry）/RK-1215A（Water-based Silicone Antifoam Agent）

In both the pulp & paper and concrete industries, foam control plays a crucial role in maintaining process stability and final product quality. Excessive foam can interfere with pulp washing, coating, or cement mixing, leading to production inefficiencies, material waste, and compromised surface finishes. Selecting the right defoamer ensures a smoother operation, higher yield, and consistent results across all production stages.

In the pulp and paper industry, foam forms easily during processes such as washing, bleaching, and paper coating. Persistent foam traps air, affects drainage, and weakens the uniformity of the paper sheet. A well-formulated defoamer rapidly breaks surface bubbles, disperses entrained air, and stabilizes production efficiency without leaving oil spots or affecting brightness.

In the concrete and building materials industry, controlling air content is equally important. Excess foam during concrete mixing can reduce density, compromise strength, and create visible surface defects. High-performance defoamers help eliminate unwanted air, improve flow and compactness, and ensure a uniform, durable finish suitable for demanding construction environments.

Rickman defoamers deliver consistent, effective foam control for both pulp and paper processing and concrete applications. Designed for long-lasting stability and compatibility with various formulations, Rickman products improve efficiency while reducing maintenance costs. Beyond products, Rickman offers tailored technical support, on-site troubleshooting, and application-specific optimization to ensure every customer achieves optimal results.

Click on the related products links：RK-0036（High Antifoaming Defoamer Compound）/RK-5DS（High Antifoaming Performance Pulp Antifoam）

Foam formation is a common challenge in cement, mortar, concrete admixtures, and other construction chemicals. Mechanical mixing, surfactants in additives, and polymer-rich formulations often trap air, leading to persistent foam. In construction, this is more than a visual problem—excessive foam can weaken concrete strength, reduce bonding performance, and cause uneven surfaces or pinholes in coatings and sealants.

In cementitious systems and polymer-modified building materials, stable foam can reduce compressive strength and durability. It may also disrupt workability, making pumping and application inconsistent. To maintain smooth flow, proper compaction, and reliable surface finish, many manufacturers introduce high-performance defoamers into their formulas.

A well-designed construction defoamer helps release entrapped air quickly, improves density, and supports uniform curing. Silicone, mineral-oil, and polyether-based defoamers are commonly used depending on system pH, viscosity, and interaction with other additives. For construction materials like plaster, putty, waterproof coatings, and repair mortars, compatibility and long-term stability are essential. An effective defoamer ensures consistent texture, reduced defects, and improved performance throughout production and application.

Rickman defoamer solutions are designed for modern construction systems. Our defoamers offer balanced foam-breaking and foam-suppression functions without affecting material flow or mechanical strength. Rickman also delivers technical evaluation, formula guidance, and tailored recommendations to help partners optimize performance in real construction environments. From product selection to after-sales support, we work closely with customers to ensure consistent quality and efficiency in every batch.

Click on the related products links：RK-1210S（High efficiency Water Based Defoamer）/RK-600P（High Efficiency Cement Antifoam）

Foam-related challenges are common throughout oil and gas operations, from drilling and cementing to production and refining. Surfactants in drilling fluids, high agitation in mixing systems, and gas entrainment during circulation often create persistent foam. If unmanaged, foam can reduce mud density, disrupt pump efficiency, and interfere with solids control equipment—ultimately increasing operational costs and safety risks.

In drilling and completion fluids, foam may also trap air and gas, affecting pressure stability and inhibiting proper lubrication and cooling. During cementing, uncontrolled foam can lead to inconsistent slurry density, reduced compressive strength, and poor zonal isolation. In amine gas treating units, excess foam contributes to reduced absorption efficiency, higher amine losses, and unplanned downtime. Because of these factors, reliable defoamer performance is essential to keeping processes stable and efficient.

Modern oilfield operations require defoamers that perform under demanding conditions. Silicone, polyether, and specialized non-silicone formulations are used to rapidly break surface foam and prevent reformation under shear. Compatibility with high temperatures, salinity, and complex fluid chemistries is also critical. A well-selected defoamer helps maintain fluid integrity, improves separation efficiency, and supports smoother production and refining processes.

Rickman defoamer solutions are engineered for oil and gas applications, offering fast response and long-lasting suppression across drilling muds, cement slurries, fracturing fluids, and amine systems. Our team provides technical support, sample evaluation, and tailored recommendations based on real operational environments. Beyond product supply, Rickman works closely with partners to optimize performance, reduce chemical consumption, and improve operational reliability from wellsite to processing plant.

Click on the related products links：RK-30C（Excellent Stability Water-Based Defoamer） /RK-700P（High Effective Fermentation Antifoam）

Foam formation is a common challenge in the paper industry, especially during pulping, stock preparation, and wet-end operations. High levels of surfactants from recycled fibers, sizing agents, and process chemicals often lead to persistent foam, which can affect drainage, sheet formation, and overall machine efficiency. Without proper control, foam may cause overflow, reduced production speed, and quality defects in finished paper.

In practical paper mill operations, defoamer performance depends heavily on system conditions. For example, in wet-end white water circulation systems, adding around 0.05% of a polyether-based defoamer can help suppress foam continuously under 48–72 hours of high-load operation, while maintaining stable paper strength and surface quality. In stock preparation stages with higher shear forces, silicone-based defoamers are often preferred for their rapid foam-breaking capability and resistance to mechanical stress.

Different defoamer types serve different needs in papermaking. Silicone defoamers typically offer fast knockdown and strong persistence, making them suitable for high-temperature or high-shear systems. Polyether defoamers, on the other hand, are valued for their compatibility with sizing agents and minimal impact on paper appearance, especially in fine paper and tissue production. Selecting the right defoamer requires balancing foam control efficiency with system compatibility and final product requirements.

Rickman defoamer solutions are developed with these real operating conditions in mind. Beyond supplying a wide range of defoamer chemistries, Rickman works closely with paper mills to evaluate process parameters, recommend suitable formulations, and adjust products based on on-site feedback. With stable supply capability, technical support, and application-driven service, Rickman helps paper producers achieve consistent foam control and smoother long-term operations.

Click on the related products links：RK-50P（Highly Efficient Polyether Ester Antifoam）/RK-203（Mineral Oil-based Defoamer）

FAQ

Q1: How do I choose between silicone and polyether defoamers for my paper mill? 

A: Selection depends on the specific process stage. Silicone defoamers are ideal for pulp washing and high-shear areas due to their rapid foam-breaking speed. Polyether defoamers are better suited for the wet-end and fine paper production, as they offer excellent compatibility with sizing agents and won't cause "oil spots" on the finished sheet.

Q2: What is the recommended dosage of defoamer in white water systems? 

A: While dosage varies by system load, a common starting point for high-efficiency polyether-based defoamers is approximately 0.05% of the total flow. We recommend conducting a jar test to optimize the dosage based on your specific surfactant levels.

Q3: Can defoamers affect the sizing efficiency or paper strength? 

A: When used correctly, high-quality defoamers like Rickman’s formulations are designed to have minimal impact. In fact, by removing entrapped air, they often improve drainage and sheet formation, which can indirectly enhance the physical strength properties of the paper.

Q4: Are Rickman defoamers stable in high-temperature pulping processes? 

A: Yes. Rickman offers specialized silicone-based and mineral oil-based defoamers that maintain stability and efficacy even in high-temperature and high-alkali pulping environments, ensuring continuous process stability.

Foam-related issues are a persistent challenge across the oil and gas industry, from upstream drilling and production to midstream processing and wastewater treatment. Foam can disrupt separation efficiency, reduce throughput, increase chemical consumption, and even trigger safety risks during high-pressure operations. As production conditions become more complex, the role of a well-matched defoamer becomes increasingly important for stable and efficient operations.

Key Defoamer Application Scenarios in the Oil & Gas Industry
Different processes generate foam for different reasons, and defoamer selection must align with actual operating conditions rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all solution.

Application Area	Foam Source	Recommended Defoamer Type
Crude oil separation	Natural surfactants, gas entrainment	Silicone-based defoamer
Drilling fluids	Polymers, surfactants, high shear	Polyether-based defoamer
Produced water treatment	Oil residues, chemical additives	Compound defoamer
Refinery wastewater	Detergents, emulsified oil	Silicone or hybrid defoamer

In produced water treatment systems, for example, adding 0.03–0.08% of a properly selected defoamer can significantly reduce surface foam during continuous operation, helping maintain separator efficiency without affecting downstream treatment performance.

Silicone vs. Polyether Defoamers: Which Works Better in Oil & Gas?

Understanding the differences between defoamer chemistries helps operators make more reliable choices under demanding conditions.

Silicone-Based Defoamers

• Strong and fast foam knockdown

• High resistance to temperature and salinity

• Suitable for crude oil processing and high-load wastewater systems

Polyether-Based Defoamers

• Better dispersion in aqueous systems

• Lower risk of oil-water separation interference

• Commonly used in drilling fluids and circulation systems

In high-temperature separators or gas-liquid separation units, silicone defoamers often deliver more consistent results. In contrast, polyether defoamers are preferred where compatibility with fluid systems and controlled foam suppression are critical.

Real Applications, Real Shipments: Rickman in Action

Rickman defoamers are currently supplied to oilfield service companies and wastewater operators across Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. In one recent application, a compound defoamer was delivered for a produced water treatment facility handling high oil content and fluctuating flow rates. On-site feedback confirmed stable foam control over multiple operating cycles, with no negative impact on oil-water separation efficiency.

Each shipment is prepared according to customer specifications, including packaging type, labeling, and logistics requirements. From bulk IBC containers to customized drums, Rickman ensures products arrive ready for immediate use under field conditions.

Why Oil & Gas Clients Choose Rickman Defoamer

Beyond product performance, Rickman places strong emphasis on service and long-term cooperation. Our technical team works closely with customers to evaluate system parameters such as temperature, salinity, shear force, and chemical compatibility before recommending a solution. Sample testing, formulation adjustment, and post-delivery support are all part of Rickman’s service approach, helping customers reduce trial-and-error costs and improve operational reliability.

FAQ

Q1: How do I select the right defoamer for oil and gas applications?
A: Selection should be based on process conditions such as temperature, salinity, shear force, and foam persistence. Field testing and technical evaluation are strongly recommended before large-scale use.

Q2: Are silicone defoamers always better for oil and gas systems?
A: Not necessarily. While silicone defoamers offer strong knockdown performance, polyether or compound defoamers may be more suitable for certain drilling fluids or wastewater systems where compatibility is critical.

Q3: Can Rickman provide customized defoamer solutions for oilfields?
A: Yes. Rickmanoffers application-specific formulation adjustments and technical support to match different oilfield conditions and operational requirements.

In the paint industry, foam formation is a major concern that can disrupt production and degrade product quality. Whether it is during the mixing process, application, or storage, foam can cause inconsistencies in paint viscosity, poor surface finish, and even equipment malfunctions. That’s why choosing the right defoamer is essential to maintain high-quality paint production and optimize efficiency. But with various options available, how do you know which defoamer is the best fit for your system?

Comparing Defoamers for Paint Production: Silicone vs. Polyether-Based Solutions

There are several types of defoamers used in paint production, but two of the most common categories are silicone-based defoamers and polyether-based defoamers. Understanding the differences between these two types can help you select the best solution based on your paint formulation and processing conditions.

Silicone-Based Defoamers: Quick Action, High Stability

Silicone defoamers are typically known for their rapid foam-breaking properties and high stability in harsh environments, including high temperature and shear conditions. They are commonly used in solvent-based and high-viscosity paints.

Advantages:

• Fast Foam Knockdown: Quickly breaks foam upon application.
• High Temperature Tolerance: Performs well under higher temperatures.
• Durable: Provides long-lasting suppression.

Best Applications:

• High-gloss coatings
• Solvent-based paints
• Industrial coatings

Polyether-Based Defoamers: Effective, Economical, and Surface-Friendly

Polyether-based defoamers, on the other hand, are known for their cost-effectiveness and compatibility with water-based paints. They work well in formulations that require minimal impact on the paint’s appearance and texture.

Advantages:

• Cost-effective: Less expensive compared to silicone defoamers.
• Low Impact on Surface Properties: Does not affect gloss or surface quality.
• Suitable for Water-Based Paints: Performs well in emulsions and waterborne systems.

Best Applications:

• Water-based paints
• Architectural coatings
• Decorative finishes

Comparison of Silicone vs. Polyether-Based Defoamers

Property	Silicone-Based Defoamer	Polyether-Based Defoamer
Speed of Action	Fast foam break	Moderate foam suppression
Temperature Tolerance	High tolerance to heat	Moderate, sensitive to heat
Cost	Higher cost	More economical
Impact on Surface Quality	May affect gloss and texture	Minimal impact on gloss and texture
Better for	Solvent-based and industrial paints	Water-based paints and emulsions

Why Choose Rickman Defoamer for Your Paint Production?

Rickman’s defoamer solutions are designed with the specific needs of the paint industry in mind. We offer both silicone and polyether-based defoamers, providing versatile solutions that cater to different production environments. Our defoamers are formulated to provide optimal foam control, reduce production time, and improve overall product quality, ensuring that your paints maintain their desired properties throughout the manufacturing process.

FAQ

Q1: What is the difference between silicone and polyether-based defoamers?
A1: Silicone-based defoamers are typically faster-acting and more stable at higher temperatures, making them ideal for solvent-based and industrial coatings. Polyether-based defoamers, on the other hand, are more economical and work well in water-based paints, offering minimal impact on surface quality.

Q2: How do I know which defoamer to choose for my paint formulation?
A2: The choice of defoamer depends on factors such as the type of paint (solvent-based or water-based), the production process, and the desired finish. Silicone defoamers are ideal for high-viscosity and solvent-based paints, while polyether defoamers are more suitable for water-based formulations.

Q3: Can Rickman help me optimize foam control in my paint production?
A3: Yes! Rickman offers personalized solutions and technical support to ensure the most effective foam control for your paint formulations, optimizing production efficiency and product quality.

Many households face the frustration of low water pressure. Whether you live on the top floor of a high-rise or in a standard residential community, common issues include weak shower flow, inefficient toilet flushing, and slow-filling washing machines.

 

To meet this demand, the market offers two primary solutions: traditional fixed-speed and modern inverter (variable-frequency) pressure booster pumps. This analysis compares their technology, application, cost-effectiveness, and performance to help you make an informed, scientific decision.

 

Core Technology & Key Differences is the fundamental difference lies in motor control:

1. Fixed-Speed Pumps use standard asynchronous motors that start via direct-on-line or star-delta methods. They operate at a constant speed (typically 2850 RPM), delivering fixed power output. This means the pump always runs at its maximum head and flow rate, unable to adjust to actual water demand.

 

2. Inverter (Variable-Frequency) Pumps integrate an intelligent control system. Key components include a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD), pressure sensors, and a PID controller. The system continuously monitors pipeline pressure via sensors. This data is processed by the PID controller, which instructs the VFD to adjust the motor's input frequency (typically within 0-50Hz/60Hz range), enabling seamless speed variation. This closed-loop control ensures pump output precisely matches real-time water consumption.

 

Performance Comparison: 

1. Pressure Stability

Fixed-Speed Pumps exhibit significant pressure fluctuation. Opening multiple water points causes a pressure drop, while reduced flow can lead to pressure spikes. Although some advanced models include a pressure tank for buffering (usually 8-24L), pressure swings can still reach 10-20%.

 

Inverter Pumps maintain remarkably constant pressure. For example, MASTER EAGLE inverter pumps keep pressure variation within ±2%, even as flow changes from zero to rated capacity. This is crucial for appliances requiring stable pressure.

 

2. Energy Efficiency

Fixed-Speed Pumps are inefficient at partial load. Even at 30% of rated flow, they consume near-full power. Frequent start-stop cycles, each drawing 2-3 times the rated current, further increase energy costs.

 

Inverter Pumps adjust output to demand, typically saving 30-50% in energy consumption. Third-party tests show that for an annual water use of 120 cubic meters, an inverter pump can save about 280 kWh. At a residential rate of $0.09/kWh, this translates to approximately $25 in annual savings.

 

3. Noise & Lifespan

Fixed-Speed Pumps generate noticeable vibration and noise (65-75 dB, similar to city traffic), especially during the high-current startup shock, which stresses components like bearings and impellers.

 

Inverter Pumps utilize soft-start technology for smooth acceleration, drastically reducing mechanical wear and noise (50-60 dB, akin to normal conversation). For instance, MASTER EAGLE smart inverter pumps demonstrate a bearing life 2.3 times longer and impeller life about 40% greater than fixed-speed models.

 

Ideal Application Scenarios: 

Fixed-Speed Pumps Are Suited For:

1.  Temporary/Short-Term Use: Rentals, construction sites where low upfront cost and simple maintenance are priorities.

2.  Single-Point Applications: Boosting pressure for an isolated bathroom or outdoor faucet with consistent, simple demand.

3.  Tight Budgets: A viable basic solution for cost-conscious homeowners.

 

 Inverter Pumps Are Recommended For:

1.  Whole-House Systems: Villas, multi-story homes with simultaneous demand from showers, appliances, etc., requiring dynamic balancing.

2.  Pressure-Sensitive Appliances: Protecting devices like gas water heaters, wall-hung boilers, or smart toilets from damage due to pressure fluctuations.

3.  Long-Term Energy Savings: For users with daily consumption over 0.5 cubic meters and annual operation exceeding 2000 hours, the higher initial investment can be recouped via electricity savings within 2-3 years.

 

Key Purchase Considerations: 

1. Initial Investment

Fixed-speed pumps range from $30-$100, while inverter pumps typically cost $120-$350. For example, a 150W fixed-speed model might cost $85, versus $275 for a 250W inverter model—a $190 difference. Based on annual energy savings of $25, the payback period is roughly 7.6 years, potentially shortening to 5-6 years when considering extended equipment lifespan and replacement cost avoidance.

 

2. Installation & Maintenance

Fixed-Speed: Simple installation (connect pipes and power). Maintenance involves checking pressure tank air pre-charge (0.1-0.15 MPa) every 6 months and replacing seals every 2 years (~$7 annual cost).

 

Inverter: Requires professional installation for parameter setup (pressure set-point, acceleration time). Maintenance includes quarterly cleaning of the VFD cooling fan and annual sensor calibration (~$20 annual cost). VFD repair can cost $75-$120.

 

Integrated Solutions: 

High-Rise Building Water Supply: For buildings over 20 floors, an inverter pump system can provide intelligent boosting. A main pump (30m head) in the basement, linked via IoT to a rooftop tank level gauge, ensures automatic refilling with minimal pressure fluctuation (<0.02 MPa).

 

Rural Decentralized Water Supply: In areas without centralized systems, an inverter pump paired with a water tower or tank (e.g., 5 cubic meters) ensures 24/7 supply while preventing water hammer caused by frequent pump cycling.

 

Solar/Heat Pump Water Heater Systems: These require extreme pressure stability. An inverter pump with constant-pressure function minimizes temperature stratification, reducing startup temperature swing from ±5°C to within ±1°C.

 

Future Trends & Innovations: 

The market is evolving towards smarter inverter pumps. High-end models now feature APP remote control, water usage monitoring, and fault alarm. Users can set time-based pressure modes (e.g., lower at night), and systems auto-optimize based on usage history.

 

In material science, Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) technology is boosting efficiency further. Fuzhou Mastere Eagle Electrics Co.,Ltd provide the PMSM inverter pumps achieve 15-20% higher efficiency than traditional asynchronous motor models, with a 30% smaller footprint and noise levels below 45 dB.

 

For most homeowners with sufficient budget and long-term plans (over 5 years), an inverter pressure booster pump is the better choice. The benefits in stable pressure, energy savings, and extended equipment life significantly enhance water experience and reduce total cost of ownership. For temporary needs or extremely tight budgets, a fixed-speed pump remains a functional basic solution. Your final decision should balance specific application scenarios, financial considerations, and desired quality of life.

 

If you would like to learn more, please visit our website: www.fzwatersystem.com

When sourcing components for fluid handling—whether for a high-end coffee machine, a medical device, or a smart water dispenser—engineers and buyers often check one box: "Food Grade."

 

Usually, this means the product meets FDA (US) standards. While FDA compliance is essential, it is not the ceiling of safety; it is the floor.

 

At [Your Company Name], we operate by a stricter benchmark: the German LFGB standard. Today, we are pulling back the curtain on why this certification matters for water pumps and why it is the defining factor between a "safe" pump and a "premium" one.

 

What Exactly is LFGB?

LFGB stands for Lebensmittel-, Bedarfsgegenstände- und Futtermittelgesetzbuch (German Food, Consumer Goods and Feed Code). It is Europe’s toughest legal framework for managing food hygiene.

 

Any material that comes into contact with food—or in our case, water and beverages—must pass rigorous testing under Sections 30 and 31 of the LFGB.

 

While the "Knife and Fork" symbol is common on Tupperware, for water pumps, this certification is about the internal components: the valve heads, the diaphragms, and the plastic chambers that the fluid travels through.

 

The Hidden Danger in Pumps: Why Testing Matters

You might wonder, “It’s just a pump. Why is the testing so strict?”

Water pumps, specifically micro-diaphragm pumps, rely on soft, flexible materials (like silicone, EPDM, or TPV) to create pressure.

 

• Chemical Migration: Under high pressure or high temperatures (like in an espresso machine), inferior rubber or plastic can break down, leaching chemical compounds into the water.

• Sensory Impact: Have you ever drunk water from a dispenser that tasted like "plastic" or "rubber"? That is the result of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) releasing from non-compliant pump materials.

 

LFGB vs. FDA: The Battle for Quality

This is the most common question we receive from our B2B clients: "Is FDA good enough, or do I need LFGB?"

To answer this, we must look at how they are tested.

 

1. The FDA Approach (The Composition Check)

FDA testing generally focuses on the raw material ingredients. If the silicone used in the pump diaphragm is made from an "approved list" of ingredients, it is typically deemed compliant. It is a safety check.

 

2. The LFGB Approach (The Performance Check)

LFGB goes much deeper. It focuses on Migration Testing. Labs simulate real-world conditions using different solvents (simulating water, acid, alcohol, and fat) to see if anything transfers from the pump material to the liquid.

 

3. The "Sensory Test" (The Dealbreaker)

This is where LFGB distinguishes itself. It includes rigorous Organoleptic (Sensory) Testing. Even if a pump is chemically safe, if it imparts any detectable smell or taste to the water, it fails LFGB testing.

 

Expert Insight: For coffee machine manufacturers, the Sensory Test is non-negotiable. The perfect espresso requires pure water. An FDA-compliant pump might still ruin the coffee's flavor profile with a rubbery aftertaste. An LFGB-compliant pump will not.

 

Feature	FDA Standard (USA)	LFGB Standard (Germany/EU)
Focus	Ingredient safety	Chemical Migration + Sensory Experience
Strictness	Standard	High / Intensive
Cost of Material	Lower	Higher (Requires high-purity curing agents)
Best Application	General hydration	Premium coffee, tea, baby formula

 

How We Engineer for LFGB Compliance

Achieving LFGB certification for a water pump isn't easy. It requires specific engineering choices that we have integrated into our manufacturing process:

• Platinum-Cured Silicone: Unlike standard peroxide-cured silicone (which is cheaper but can smell), we use platinum-curing processes for our diaphragms. This ensures high tear resistance and zero odor.

• High-Stability Plastics: Our pump housings use medical-grade plastics that withstand high temperatures without degrading or releasing micro-particles.

• Third-Party Verification: We don't just say we are compliant. We submit our components to accredited testing agencies (such as TÜV Rheinland or SGS) to verify compliance with LFGB Sections 30 & 31.

 

Why This Matters for Your Business

If you are a manufacturer integrating our pumps into your devices, choosing LFGB components offers three distinct advantages:

 

1. Market Access: You cannot sell food-contact electronics in Germany or France without this standard. It opens the door to the entire EU market.

2. Brand Protection: It protects your brand from consumer complaints regarding "bad tasting water."

3. Durability: Materials that pass LFGB migration tests are inherently more stable. They last longer, meaning your pumps have a longer service life with fewer failures.

 

Portable Pump System for Dispensing Potable Water from Standard Water Bottles.

 

The BW5000 series bottled water system is designed to pump purified water from commercially available 5-gallon purified water bottles. The system will deliver the water under pressure to an individual drinking water faucet, the water inlet of a refrigerator for the ice-maker and chilled drinking water tap, to a faucet in portable sinks and to certain personal use and commercial use coffee / tea brewers / espresso machines.

 

When the suction wand is inserted into the standard 5-gallon bottle, it will activate the float switch on the end of the wand and turn on the pump. This same float switch shuts off the system when the bottle is empty. The wand has a built in back-flow prevents valve that prevents water in the system from flowing back into the bottle, or spilling while changing bottles. The heart of the system is the main module that automatically fills an appliance or dispenses water through a faucet when there is demand. The system is equipped with an automatic thermal cut-off device for additional protection.

 

Select a cabinet large enough to accommodate the 5 gallon (19L) bottle and suction wand assembly. Place the pump module on the floor of the cabinet with on/off switch and suction tube facing out toward the cabinet doors. Position as close as possible to a grounded electrical outlet and place the five gallon bottle close to the pump module without kinking the suction hose

The bottled water dispensing system may also be placed in a pantry, closet, cellar or other location where a grounded electrical outlet is available.